Welcome!

"We have very little control over what happens in our lives, but we have a lot of control over how we integrate and remember what happens. It is precisely these spiritual choices that determine whether we live our lives with dignity." --Henri Nouwen

Sunday, July 01, 2007

What to Make of George?

Now that W is almost toast, I find myself wondering what to make of him, how to capture what he has meant for me and this country as I see it. Consider this a work in progress as the dark days of his reign wind down.

He has so many faces, from the playful frat house smart ass to the devout, born again crusader against a woman's right to choose, the teaching of evolution, and gay marriage; from the resolute commander in chief in military drag (ironic since, as a young man, he avoided serving in the military) to the buffoon deliberately garbling words and sentences. Which of these will loom largest in my memory of him?

And although he's gotta be one of the worst presidents in history, still, in the past couple of weeks he has actually made some good efforts as George Packer notes:

He strengthened sanctions on Sudanese companies and officials in response to the ongoing massacres in Darfur. He called on Congress to double the funding for global AIDS programs, to thirty billion dollars. He directed his envoy in Baghdad, Ambassador Ryan Crocker, to sit down with his Iranian counterpart and discuss ways of stabilizing Iraq—the most high-profile meeting between top officials of the two countries in years. And he attacked the demagoguery of right-wing critics of the bipartisan immigration bill.

Still, as Packer continues: "Bush's legacy will be the war in Iraq and, secondarily, the array of decisions on prisoners, alliances, treaties, and preventive war which revolutionized American foreign policy after September 11th."

I know that, like myself, George is complex, a mixture of the savage and the noble, of ignorance and brilliance, good and evil. And it is wrong to overlook that complexity, seeing him in black and white terms, reducing him to either good or evil. And it's possible that in the months ahead I will see him for the human congeries that he is.

But as of this moment, I see him as a man culpably ignorant and blinded by arrogance, an insecure man who brooks no dissent, whose shock and awe tactics have unleashed great suffering on hundreds of thousands, and whose legacy we Americans will be trying for generations to overcome.

Note: Just a day or so after I wrote the above words, W, true to form, subverted the legal process and commuted Scooter Libby's sentence. Looks like my last paragraph stands. Is there no end to this guy's arrogance?

3 comments:

Randy said...

I too am puzzled with how to think about the GW presidency. He has been such a colossal disappointment! I try to find the good.

While the war (both Afghan and Iraqi) will forever loom large, I am struck by the apparent change in the make up of the supreme court. At last, it appears we may have a majority that will simply interpret the law as written and not legislate from the bench. This to me is a hopeful sign.

Anonymous said...

there is too much junk in this post to address, but i will say this:
Bush in no way subverted legality in his action, the presidential right to commute sentences or grant pardons is given in the Constitution. He in fact agreed with the verdict, just not with the sentence. It is not arrogance, more like consideration for the difficulties Libby has already been through, and the punishment he has already received (fines etc).
Try to think a little more before adhering to the liberal left's talking points.

Richard L. Smith said...

Thanks for your comment. I have neither the legal brains nor the time to give a fitting reply, but Edward Lazarus does, and I refer you to his thoughtful article: http://writ.news.findlaw.com/lazarus/20070705.html